People v. Lopez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that various comments made by the prosecutor during her summation were improper and deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant either did not object to the remarks at issue or made only general objections, or his objections were sustained without any further request for curative instructions and he failed to move for a mistrial (see People v Philbert, 60 AD3d 698 [2009]; People v Dashosh, 59 AD3d 731 [2009]; People v Boyce, 54 AD3d 1052 [2008]). In any event, the challenged remarks constituted fair comment on the evidence or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. LaValleNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. BajanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. ErskineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. CassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.