Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Neshannock Presbyterian Church

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1943No. Appeal, 56PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The plaintiff, describing himself as owner of a lot in a cemetery operated by defendant, brought a bill in equity to have a regulation, adopted by the defendant, declared invalid as unreasonable and unlawful interference with his rights under the terms of the grant ’of the lot to him. His prayer for relief and the proof 'offered to support the averments in the bill show plainly that his' real interest is not that of a lot owner but of a funeral director whose business is interfered with by this regulation. He was asked if he were not in court as a funeral director and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dries v. Evans Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Cedar Hill Cemetery Co. v. LeesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Benson v. Laurel Hill Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Di Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Slifer v. Greenmount Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Ignatowski v. St. Mary's Polish Catholic Cemetery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Moore v. Forest Lawn Gardens, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API