Legal Opinion
Sea World of Florida, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Companies
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 12, 2010No. 5D08-1496, 5D08-1497, 5D08-4197, 5D09-2497PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEvander, J.
Appellants (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Sea World”) were sued by Robert DuFault for personal injuries suf fered by him while performing certain repair work on Sea World’s premises. Sea World ultimately settled DuFault’s claim and then brought an action for contractual indemnity against appellees (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Hobart”). The jury determined that Hobart was solely responsible for DuFault’s injuries and that Sea World was entitled to be reimbursed by Hobart for the settlement payment made to DuFault ($85,000), as well as the amount expended for attorney’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lyle v. LyleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Sarkis v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Dade County v. PenaSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Crittenden Orange Blossom Fruit v. StoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tri-Town Construction Company, Inc. v. Commerce Park Associates 12, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
- Robin Roshkind, P.A. v. MacHielaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- SOURCETRACK, LLC v. Ariba, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Air Turbine Technology, Inc. v. Quarles & Brady, LLC, Quarles & Brady, LLP and Richard HornDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- VALENTIN RODRIGUEZ P.A. v. RICHARD ALTOMAREDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.