Legal Opinion
Patrick Fur Farm, Inc. v. United Vaccines, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided July 26, 2005No. 2004AP2851PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. Patrick Fur Farm, Inc., appeals a summary judgment dismissing its claims against United Vaccines, Inc., and its insurer, Zurich American Insurance Company. Patrick argues the circuit court erred by concluding its state law claims were preempted by federal law. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2. Patrick operates a large mink ranch in Rib Lake. In 1998, Patrick purchased BIOCOM-DR a vaccine for its mink herd, from United Vaccines through its agent, Roger Brady. Patrick claims it purchased the vaccine based on Brady's representations that it was 95-98% effective against…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Southeast Wisconsin Professional Baseball Park District v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- SOUTHEAST WISCONSIN v. MitsubishiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- Brown v. State Dep't of Children & FamiliesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
- Anderson v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.