Legal Opinion

Dresser Industries, Inc. v. Lindley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1984No. 83-1395PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented for review is whether Jeffrey’s acquisition of property from its subcontractors is exempt from taxation under R.C. 5739.01(E)(1). The Board of Tax Appeals held that such property is tax exempt. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

R.C. 5739.01 states in part as follows:

“(E) ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is:
“(1) To resell the thing transferred * * * in the form in which the same is, or is to be, received by him * *

In construing the applicability of an exemption under R.C. 5739.01(E)(1) where the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Shoe Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Fliteways, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Jim White Chevrolet Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. American Totalisator Co. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. NLO, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. American Totalisator Systems, Inc. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. ATS Ohio, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. UPS Oasis Supply Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API