Richfood, Inc. v. Robert Ragsdale
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ANNUNZIATA, Judge.
Richfood, Inc. (Richfood) appeals the decision of the commission, finding Robert Ragsdale (claimant) to be a statutory employee of Richfood and, thus, qualified for benefits under the Act. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
Claimant operates his own trucking business as a sole proprietor and is uninsured for workers’ compensation purposes. On March 2, 1993, claimant operated his truck under contract with Perdue, Inc. to deliver turkeys from Perdue’s plant to Richfood’s facility in Mechanicsville, Virginia. While unloading the Perdue turkeys at Richfood’s warehouse, claim…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baker v. NussmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
- City of Waynesboro Sheriff's Department v. HarterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
- Sinclair v. Shelter Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
- Brown v. Lawson Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
- Sites Const. Co., Inc. v. HarbesonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cordova v. AlperFairfax County Circuit Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. ParkFairfax County Circuit Court · 1999
- James A. Wells, Jr. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
- Wood v. AdamsonVirginia Circuit Court · 2002