Legal Opinion

Richfood, Inc. v. Robert Ragsdale

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided November 10, 1997No. 0512972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANNUNZIATA, Judge.

Richfood, Inc. (Richfood) appeals the decision of the commission, finding Robert Ragsdale (claimant) to be a statutory employee of Richfood and, thus, qualified for benefits under the Act. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Claimant operates his own trucking business as a sole proprietor and is uninsured for workers’ compensation purposes. On March 2, 1993, claimant operated his truck under contract with Perdue, Inc. to deliver turkeys from Perdue’s plant to Richfood’s facility in Mechanicsville, Virginia. While unloading the Perdue turkeys at Richfood’s warehouse, claim…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. NussmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
  2. City of Waynesboro Sheriff's Department v. HarterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1985
  3. Sinclair v. Shelter Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1996
  4. Brown v. Lawson Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  5. Sites Const. Co., Inc. v. HarbesonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cordova v. AlperFairfax County Circuit Court · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. ParkFairfax County Circuit Court · 1999
  3. James A. Wells, Jr. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company and Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
  4. Wood v. AdamsonVirginia Circuit Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API