White v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
The demurrers to the indictment were properly overruled. Douglass v. State, 21 Ala. App. 289, 107 So. 791; Sims v. State, 23 Ala. App. 387, 126 So. 498; Terry v. State, ante, p. 321, 134 So. 820.
We find no fault in the rulings of the court permitting testimony as to what occurred at the time of the arrest of appellant; his efforts to evade arrest, etc. Evidence as to any conduct or declarations of the • accused having relation to the offense charged, indicating his consciousness of guilt, is always admissible. Palmer v. State, 15 Ala. App. 262, 73 So. 139; Ex parte Palmer, 198 Ala. 693, 73…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Douglass v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Stinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Palmer v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
- Horn v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Sims v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Golston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
- Garrett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950
- Kincey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Askew v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.