Legal Opinion

Jenna Gordius v. Randall G. Kelley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 26, 2016No. Docket Han-15-100PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJabar, J.

[¶ 1] Randall G. Kelley appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Ellsworth, Mallonee, J.) determining that he was not a de facto parent of Jenna Gordius’s child. Because key factual findings are in conflict in the court’s findings, we must vacate the court’s decision and remand for further proceedings.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] The following facts are derived from the trial court’s findings, and we review them with considerable deference. Buck v. Buck, 2015 ME 33, ¶ 5, 113 A.3d 1095.

[¶ 3] Kelley and Gordius were in a romantic relationship for approximately ten years before they were married in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. C.E.W. v. D.E.W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  3. Matthew W. Pitts v. Amanda M. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  4. Young v. YoungSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  5. Matthew W. Buck v. Lisa H. BuckSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Guardianship of Hailey M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  2. Louise Dorr v. Sarah WoodardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  3. Todd A. Kilborn v. Nicole CareySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  4. Jenna Gordius v. Randall G. KelleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  5. Katrina M. Welch v. Naomi R. ChavareeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API