Legal Opinion

Ginocchi v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1925No. Appeal, 10PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The plaintiffs sued to recover for the death of their son, aged thirteen, and obtained a judgment in the court below. Reversal is asked for the reason defendant was not negligent, and the trial court erred in its instruction to the jury relative to the boy’s earning capacity.

At eight o’clock in the morning, the boy was sent with the noon-day meal to his father, employed- at the Carnegie Steel Company, New Castle. The street leading to the place where the father worked was crossed by a number of railroad tracks just before entering the plant; some were owned by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kehler v. Schwenk, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1891
  2. Hoon v. Beaver Valley Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  3. Parker v. Washington Electric Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Sebring v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. KillipsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marinelli v. Montour RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Kowtko v. Delaware and Hudson Railroad Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Krasowski v. White Star Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Oestreich Et Ux. v. ZibmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Chambers v. Ellis, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API