Legal Opinion

Constance v. Traders & General Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 27, 1964No. 1254Published

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Judge.

This is a tort action instituted by Mary Faye Constance, in which plaintiff claims damages alleged to have been sustained by her as the result of a motor vehicle collision. One of the automobiles involved in the collision was owned by plaintiff’s mother and was being driven by plaintiff, and the other was owned and was being driven by Charles R. Murphy. The suit was instituted against Murphy, who was uninsured, and against Traders & General Insurance Company, the liability insurer of the car which plaintiff was driving. Plaintiff’s claim against Traders & General is based on an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Musmeci v. American Automobile Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Ropollo v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API