Legal Opinion

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Vetter

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 15, 1916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Proceeding upon the-probate of a will.

1Opinion of the Court

Fowler, S. —

The motions for judgment on the findings of the jury and for .a' new trial having come on to be heard, pursuant to the practice indicated in Matter of Dorsey (94 Misc. Rep. 566), I have examined the record and find no error of substance. The order of proof and the conduct of the trial in this *440matter on the issues submitted to the jury under the new law regulating contested probate proceedings before juries were correct. The order of proof at common law is .always in the discretion of the trial judge presiding at jury trials. The surrogate can have no less, no greater, or no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Clary v. FitzgeraldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of PlateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
  4. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of DorseyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916
  5. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of EnoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of HuberNew York Surrogate's Court · 1918
  2. In re the Final Account of the Administration of the Estate of SeymourNew York Surrogate's Court · 1920
  3. In re the Estate of GleasonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API