Hartzo v. American National Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentParro, J.
Li respectfully disagree with the majority opinion for the following reasons.
On a motion for summary judgment, the initial burden of proof is on the moving party. However, on issues for which the moving party will not bear the burden of proof at trial, the moving party’s burden of *1126proof on the motion is satisfied by pointing out to the court that there is an absence of factual support for one or more elements essential to the adverse party’s claim, action, or defense. Thereafter, the nonmov-ing party must produce factual support sufficient to establish that it will be able to satisfy its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Francois v. YbarzabalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Norton v. LewisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Manzella v. DoeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Perkins v. McDowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.