Legal Opinion
Vossman v. AirNet Sys., Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 17, 2018No. 16AP-801PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDorrian, J.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Dan W. Vossman ("Vossman"), along with his attorneys, Russell A. Kelm and Joanne Detrick (collectively "appellants"), appeal the November 7, 2016 judgment entry of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas which made final and appealable the court's: (1) February 12, 2015 decision and entry finding defendants-appellees, AirNet Systems, Inc. ("AirNet"), Thomas Schaner, and Quinn Hamon (collectively "appellees"), are entitled to recover attorney fees from appellants, pursuant to R.C. 2323.51(A)(2)(a)(ii), for the time period April 26 through December 10, 2012, and (2)…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Shirley J. MITCHELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOLEDO HOSPITAL, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Manzer v. Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Calypso Asset Mgt., L.L.C. v. 180 Indus., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Reece v. Davis-WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2026
- Williams v. Natl. Assn. for the Advancement of Colored PeopleOhio Court of Appeals · 2023