Legal Opinion

Mattis Et Ux. v. Arcadia Coal Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1942No. Appeal, 232PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The compensation authorities found that the claimants were totally dependent for support upon their deceased son, John Anthony Mattis, at the time of an accident, which proved fatal, and granted an award at the rate of $9.88 per week for 300 weeks. This appeal is from the order of the court sustaining that award.

The appellants do not dispute the fact that deceased was fatally injured in the course of his employment with the Arcadia Coal Company and concede a liability for partial dependency, but contend that the facts adduced do not justify the finding that the parents…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Creasy v. Phœnix Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Shimkus v. Phila. & Reading C. & I. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Kovatch Et Ux. v. DurkinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Feldman v. Pictorial Review—Women's World Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Kloskowski Et Ux. v. Hudson Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DiCampli v. General Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Uber v. Bobo & Bango Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. DiCampli v. General Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Enforcement of Support Law, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1952
  5. Yurski v. Continental-Archbald Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API