Legal Opinion

United States v. Redmond

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 24, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 19829PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNTON, District Judge.

The Government brings this civil action for the recovery of tax refunds allegedly erroneously made to defendant taxpayer. The case has been submitted on the stipulation of facts filed herein and on the testimony of the taxpayer. The taxes involved are retail jewelry excise taxes covering various periods from February 1953 through September 1956. The only issue is whether certain sales of jewelry made by defendant taxpayer to certain corporations are sales at retail within the purview of the statute — Section 2400 of the *859Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nathan Gellman, Burt Horwitz and Peter Podany, Co-Partners, D/B/A Gellman Brothers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  2. Louis, Ned E. And Basil A. Torti, Doing Business as Wisconsin De Luxe Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  3. Worrell's Limited, Doing Business as R. D. Worrell Jewelry Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  4. Laufman v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Marvin Redmond, D/B/A Redmond's JewelersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  2. Wilson Chemical Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API