Legal Opinion
Lane v. Buckley
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 17, 2016No. 15-8111UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
Robert M. Lane, pro se; appeals the district court’s denial of his emergency motion for a preliminary injunction (PI Motion). Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Mr. Lane filed a complaint in Arizona state court alleging (among other things and as relevant to this appeal) that one of the defendants — his sister, Patricia E. Lane — managed DFWU, LLC, whose sole owners were entities representing Mr. Lane’s retirement funds. According to Mr. Lane, she breached her fiduciary duties to him by loaning herself…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yang v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Heideman v. South Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Daigle v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Dorothy Willner v. University of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Atari Games Corporation and Tengen, Inc., Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Nintendo of America, Inc., and Nintendo Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- New Mexico Department of Game & Fish v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Digital Ally, Inc. v. Culp McAuley, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Kansas, State of v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- New Mexico Department of Game & Fish v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017