Legal Opinion
Antonelli v. Planning Bd. of Waldwick
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 7, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
79 N.J. Super. 433 (1963)
191 A.2d 788
RALPH ANTONELLI AND MARIE ANTONELLI, HIS WIFE, AND DANIEL AMSTER AND LUCILLE J. AMSTER, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF WALDWICK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 25, 1963.
Decided June 7, 1963.
Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.
Mr. Alfred S. Nugent, Jr. argued the cause for defendant (Messrs. Orbe and Nugent, attorneys).
Mr. Daniel Amster argued the cause for plaintiffs.
The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.
The Law Division granted summary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Rexon v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, BOROUGH OF HADDONFIELDSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- North Plainfield v. PeroneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Saddle River Country Day School v. BOROUCH OF SADDLE RIVERNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- NEWARK, CREAM CO. v. Parsippany-Troy Hills Twp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lima & Sons, Inc. v. Borough of RamseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Carbone v. Weehawken Tp. Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Engleside at West Condominium Ass'n v. Land Use BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Fieramosca v. Barnegat Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Gayatriji v. Borough of Seaside Heights Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.