Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Schmitt

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 25, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millard, S.

This is an application by the widow of a deceased son of this testatrix for leave to intervene in this probate proceed*181ing, both individually and as administratrix of her husband’s estate, and for leave to file objections. Testatrix died on September 5, 1940. She was survived by a daughter, whom she named as executor and trustee in her will, and also by two grandchildren, the issue of the deceased son who was the husband of this petitioner. The will, which was executed on November 16, 1937, subsequent to the death of the son, makes no provision for his benefit.

Petitioner contends…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Greenwood v. . HolbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. In re the Estate of AckermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. In re EnnisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  5. In re the Estate of LiebermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of ChadwellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1968
  2. In re the Accounting of EganNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  3. In re the Estate of BlazejNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  4. In re Estate of BrumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  5. In re the Estate of TurnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API