Legal Opinion
Alejano v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEM.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 28, 1979No. 79-437PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
378 So.2d 104 (1979)
Pedro ALEJANO, Appellant,
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 79-437.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
December 28, 1979.
Kuvin, Klingensmith & Lewis and R. Fred Lewis, Genden & Bach, Miami, for appellant.
Talburt, Kubicki & Bradley and Betsey E. Hartley, Miami, for appellee.
Before PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ., and CHAPPELL, BILL G., Associate Judge.
2Per curiam
The final judgment appealed from is affirmed upon a holding that (a) an insurance company has no duty to explain uninsured motorist coverage to an insurance applicant unless the applicant asks for…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. BrattonSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- All Florida Surety Company v. CokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. YatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Sutton v. CraneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Lopez v. Midwest Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
4Cited by17 opinions
- MERRILL, LYNCH, PIERCE, ETC. v. BentonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- NATIONWIDE PROP. & CAS. v. MarchesanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Vasquez v. Bankers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. KauffmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Bennett v. BerkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.