Legal Opinion

In re Naomi P.

New York City Family Court

Decided February 4, 2015Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John M. Hunt, J.

I

Respondent, Trinidad M., is the biological father of the *768subject children, David, Gustavo and Vania, and the stepfather of the subject child, Naomi P.

Respondent has admitted to committing one or more sex offenses against Naomi, and the evidence establishes that he has not received professional treatment for pedophilia, “a condition the psychiatric profession itself classifies as a serious mental disorder” (Kansas v Hendricks, 521 US 346, 360 [1997]).

Petitioner, Commissioner of the New York City Administration for Children’s Services (ACS), has filed child…

2Cases cited84 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API