Legal Opinion
DOR
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided March 18, 2025No. ID 4088PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
29 I&N Dec. 20
(BIA 2025) Interim Decision #4088 Matter of Jonalson DOR, Respondent Decided March 18, 2025 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The time of conviction is the relevant point for determining whether a respondent’s State conviction is for a controlled substance offense under section 237(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) (2018), not the time the respondent’s removability is adjudicated in immigration proceedings. FOR THE RESPONDENT: Claire E. Maguire, Esquire, Lynn,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Clark v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Eleazar Esau Avalos Flores v. Kristi Noem, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Valentin Aguilar Rangel v. Kristi Noem, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026