Legal Opinion
Gray v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 29, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
This is an action of tort to recover damages for personal injuries, received by the plaintiff while travelling as a passenger upon an elevated train of the defendant. At the conclusion of the evidence, on written motion the judge directed a verdict for the defendant and reported the case to this court on the following stipulation of the parties:
“ 1. If the order of the court directing a verdict for the defendant was right, judgment is to be entered for the defendant.
“ 2. If the order of the court directing a verdict for the defendant was wrong, judgment is to be entered for the plaintiff in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Work v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- McGann v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Weinschenk v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Timms v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Stangy v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brennan v. Ocean View Amusement Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Cuddyer v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Weiner v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Berger v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Tsacoyeanes v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.