Quimby v. Hewey
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On Exceptions by Plaintiff. From tbe bill of exceptions it appeared that this case came before the court for an adjudication of a trustee disclosure. The action was assumpsit on an account annexed to the writ for the sum of §89.98. The account annexed showed that the amount sued for or the principal part thereof was for groceries, provisions and clothing, but otherwise than this there was no affirmative allegation in the writ that the suit was for necessaries.
Read the full summary
On Exceptions by Plaintiff. From tbe bill of exceptions it appeared that this case came before the court for an adjudication of a trustee disclosure. The action was assumpsit on an account annexed to the writ for the sum of §89.98. The account annexed showed that the amount sued for or the principal part thereof was for groceries, provisions and clothing, but otherwise than this there was no affirmative allegation in the writ that the suit was for necessaries. By the disclosure of the trustee it appeared that at the time of disclosure, there was due the principal defendant and held by trustee…
1Opinion of the CourtFogler, J.
Exceptions by plaintiff to the ruling of the presiding justice discharging the trustee..
The action is assumpsit on an account annexed to the writ. Service was made upon the trustee December 12, 1896, and again *132February 3, 1897, and again March 4, 1897. The disclosure of the. -trustee, fairly construed, shows that the principal. defendant was employed by the trustee as a night watchman; that nothing was due him by the trustee at the time of the first service; that at the time of the second service there was> due him the sum of $11.86; that there was due him at the time of the last service the…
2Cited by1 opinion
- SEA SALT LLC v. TD BANK NADistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021