Legal Opinion

Handley v. May

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 6, 1979PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

This is an action for slander, presenting on appeal as a principal issue whether the plaintiff, as a matter of law, must plead in his complaint the precise words proved at trial.

The complaint alleges defendant had told one W. A. Jones, Sr., that plaintiff was “a member of organized crime and was acting in consort with other members of organized crime in Knoxville and surrounding communities.” Jones’ testimony was offered by deposition at the trial and he stated defendant had said to him that “Dan Bectol, who is the manager of Credit Bureau in Knoxville, was connected with…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Memphis Publishing Co. v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Pursell v. Wolverine-Pentronix, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Mell v. EdgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Altoona Clay Products, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Davis v. the TennesseanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. Myers v. Pickering Firm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  3. Hibdon v. GrabowskiCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  4. Z.J. v. Vanderbilt Univ.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2018
  5. Moore v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API