Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 23, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Petition by the libellee in a divorce proceeding for the revision of an order directing him to pay $1,500 permanent alimony to his divorced wife, charged with the support of their minor child. See 88 Vt. 134. Heard at the December Term, 1914, Orange County, Donoiuay, J., presiding. Petition denied. The petitioner excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Anabel Miller was granted a bill of divorce from James C. Miller, by the Orange County Court at its December Term, 1913. She was granted the care and custody of a very young minor child, their only child, and it was ordered and decreed that James C. Miller pay her the sum of .fifteen hundred dollars, as permanent alimony. James claimed that the court that, granted the divorce was without jurisdiction and *548brought the case to this Court on that ground and on no other. See 88 Vt. 134, 92 Atl. 9.

The claim then made was not sustained and the case was remanded with directions that a new time be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buckminster v. BuckminsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1865
  2. Andrew v. AndrewSupreme Court of Vermont · 1889
  3. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  4. City of Montpelier v. Town of ElmoreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
  5. Curtis v. GordonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Poole v. First Nat. Bank of SmyrnaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  2. Taylor v. Henderson and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Watts v. Mulliken's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  4. Kennard v. KennardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  5. Valenti v. Imperial Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API