Legal Opinion

City of Evansville v. Pifer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1913No. 8,000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Posey Circuit Court; Eerdis F. Clements, Judge. Action by George Pifer against the City of Evansville and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

— Appellee’s wife, Mollie Pifer, upon the same facts involved in this appeal, recovered judgment in the court below against appellants for personal injuries sustained by her, which judgment was affirmed in this court. See City of Evansville v. Pifer (1912), 51 Ind. App. 646, 100 N. E. 110.

1. It is insisted by appellee that the brief filed by appellants in this ease is defective in the following particulars: first, in the statement of the nature of the action. Appellant’s statement is as follows: “This action was brought by appellee to recover damages for loss of service, etc., of appellee’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Evansville v. PiferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. South Whitley Hoop Co. v. Union National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. South Whitley Hoop Co. v. Union National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API