Legal Opinion

Denzik v. Denzik

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2006No. 2004-SC-1131-DGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

197 S.W.3d 108 (2006)

Gary DENZIK, Appellant,

v.

Candy DENZIK, Now Blazar, Appellee.

No. 2004-SC-1131-DG.

Supreme Court of Kentucky.

June 15, 2006.

Rehearing Denied August 24, 2006.

Kelly Thompson Jr., Thompson & Associates PSC, Bowling Green, Counsel for Appellants.

Timothy J. Crocker, Mark Allen Thurmond, Crocker & Wilkey, Franklin, Counsel for Appellee.

WINTERSHIMER, Justice.

This appeal is from an opinion of the Court of Appeals which reversed a judgment based on a jury verdict rendered against Blazar for fraudulent misrepresentation.

The questions presented are whether there is sufficient evidence…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Perma Research and Development Company v. The Singer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  2. United Parcel Service Co. v. RickertKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bierman v. KlaphekeKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Lewis v. Bledsoe Surface Mining Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Norman S. Gottreich and Margareta E. Gottreich v. San Francisco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API