Legal Opinion

Arwine v. Alaska Steamship Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1937No. 26512. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The respondent, a seaman, sued on his own behalf and as assignee of eight other seamen to recover wages arising out of his own and his assignors ’ employment on a vessel owned by the appellant.

Respondent and assignors signed shipping articles at Seattle on March 13, 1936, for a voyage to Alaska and return, at a stipulated monthly wage. The appellant was unable to secure an engine room crew because of a strike, and the voyage was cancelled. Respondent and his assignors were discharged on March 14, 1936. They were paid two days ’ wages. At the time of payment, which was made through the office…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Steel TraderSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. The Charles D. LaneDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1901
  3. Great CantonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1924
  4. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
  5. Clark v. The St. PaulDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Joseph A. Zarraga, in No. 13226, Martin D. Ladd, in No. 13,227, George Martin, in No. 13,228 v. Texas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  2. Newman v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API