Legal Opinion

Charnock v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1904No. 194PublishedCited by 27 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. In order to be binding; upon the shipper a contract limiting the common law liability of a carrier must be upheld by a valid consideration. Hutchinson on Carriers, § 278; Wehman v. Minneapolis &c. Co., 61 Am. & Eng.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. In order to be binding; upon the shipper a contract limiting the common law liability of a carrier must be upheld by a valid consideration. Hutchinson on Carriers, § 278; Wehman v. Minneapolis &c. Co., 61 Am. & Eng. R. Cases, 273. In Louisiana, where the consideration is denied, and the evidence leaves its existence or reality in doubt, the burden is on the carrier to prove the consideration. Mossop v. His Creditors, 41 La. Ann. 297. The validity, or effect of the exemption is…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr, Justice McI£enna

delivered the opinion of the court.

The. case was removed from the Civil District Court in and for the Parish of Orleans to. the United States Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana by' defendant, on the' ground that it was a corporation organized by an act of Congress of the United States.

The petition alleges that plaintiff delivered to defendant, at a point on the line of its railway called Meekers’ Switch, to be transported to New Orleans, fifty-two bales of ..cotton at a rate of freight then and there agreed upon and a bill of lading issued to plaintiff..…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roth v. HarksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1866

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Canadian Northern Ry. Co. v. SenskeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. Southern Pac. Co. v. HetzerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. George W. LintCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
  5. Shandrew v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API