Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramon Andrade-Castillo

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 7, 2015No. 14-50511Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

We previously remanded Ramon An-drade-Castillo’s (Andrade) appeal of the sentence imposed on his 2013 illegal reentry conviction because the record was ambiguous as to whether the district court impermissibly relied on prosecutorial costs as a sentencing factor. See United States v. Tapia-Romero, 523 F.3d 1125, 1127 (9th Cir.2008). We instructed the district court to clarify the basis for its sentence and determine in the first instance whether resentencing was required. The district court did not do so, but instead imposed a sentence of time served plus a five-year term of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HammonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lisa RAPAL, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Suzanne FORBES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Tapia-RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API