Legal Opinion
Middleton v. Humble
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 1, 1937No. 5356PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DREW, Judge.
This case has been here before. The last time it was here we remanded the case for the purpose of hearing testimony as to agency.
Plaintiffs sued for damages for the death of their child who was killed by an automobile owned by defendant and alleged to have been driven at the time of the accident by an employee or agent of defendant acting within the scope of his employment. The reasons for remanding the case for further testimony are fully stated in the former decision of this court, reported in 154 So. 400. After hearing testimony on the question of agency, the lower court found…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- May v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Swedman v. Standard Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Johnson v. Jim Brownlee, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Middleton v. HumbleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by12 opinions
- Parks v. HallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Whittington v. Western Union Tel. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Culver v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1946
- Leson Chevrolet Co. v. Phoenix Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- McCorkle v. Service Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.