Legal Opinion

State v. Hart

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 21, 2001No. 00-1444-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, PJ.

¶ 1. What we face in this case is an inebriated citizen whom an officer decided he would not arrest but could not safely release on the streets either. A protective frisk for weapons produced not a weapon but a marijuana pipe. The State contends the existence of probable cause for operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) by itself is enough to justify the search, and the subsequent arrest was a mere formality. We agree there are circumstances when, based upon probable cause, an arrest is inevitable and therefore it is a mere formality whether arrest comes before or after the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SykesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. NesbitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
  3. Nancy Bartlett v. Tony EversWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Nancy Bartlett v. Tony EversWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Nancy Bartlett v. Tony EversWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API