State v. Hart
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, PJ.
¶ 1. What we face in this case is an inebriated citizen whom an officer decided he would not arrest but could not safely release on the streets either. A protective frisk for weapons produced not a weapon but a marijuana pipe. The State contends the existence of probable cause for operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) by itself is enough to justify the search, and the subsequent arrest was a mere formality. We agree there are circumstances when, based upon probable cause, an arrest is inevitable and therefore it is a mere formality whether arrest comes before or after the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SykesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. NesbitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
- Nancy Bartlett v. Tony EversWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Nancy Bartlett v. Tony EversWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- Nancy Bartlett v. Tony EversWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.