Legal Opinion

Gounder v. Kurup

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 22, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

*9OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the judgment, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed without costs.

In September 2000, plaintiff Shanthi Gounder purchased a house (the premises) which was occupied by a tenant, defendant Chandrika Kurup, who resided there with her daughter and without a written lease. Defendant continued to reside in the premises, and she paid rent until the autumn of 2006. During that time, Shanthi Gounder, and her husband, plaintiff Veeramuthu Gounder, came to believe that defendant was operating a children’s music and dance school on the premises.

After defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sloninski v. WestonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Hanehan v. HanehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Catholic Guardian Society of the Diocese of Brooklyn, Inc. v. Elba V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API