Legal Opinion

Slusser v. Daniel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 25, 1922No. 10609PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The record discloses that on the 28th day of August, 1918, the' defendants in '■ errof, plaintiffs below, and herein referred. to as plaintiffs, commenced their action against the. plaintiff in error, herein referred to as defendant, by filing their petition in the county court of Ottawa county, Okla.',' alleging, in substance, that the plaintiffs, in the early part of-the month of March; 1918, entered into an oral contract with one H. E. Roll, then the duly authorized and acting agent of the defendant, whereby it was agreed between the plaintiffs and defendant that plaintiffs should…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CoulsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  2. Atkins v. BeanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Riley v. LindleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API