Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. George

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1998PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence, as made final by the denial of appellant’s post-sentencing motions,1 entered following appellant’s convictions for robbery,2 *918criminal conspiracy,3 unlawful restraint,4 ter-roristic threats,5 simple assault6 and robbery of a motor vehicle.7 The sole issue presented for our review is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain appellant’s conviction for robbery of a motor vehicle. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of sentence.

Before addressing the merits of appellant’s claim, we will briefly recount the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ValetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. DantineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. Group W Television, Inc. v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Karim Eley v. Charles EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. SpotzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. State v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. WadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. A.W. Robl TransportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API