Legal Opinion

Dimare v. George F. Driscoll Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the grounds: (1) The place from which plaintiff fell was not a place of work which the general contractor was bound to keep safe from the defects of which complaint is here made; it was under the control of plaintiff’s employer. (See general rule stated by Mr. Justice Davis in Wohlfron v. Brooklyn Edison Co., Inc., 238 App. Div. 463; affd., 263 N. Y. 547.) (2) It was not a place of work provided by defendant, appellant. (Iacono v. Frank & Frank Contracting Co., 259 N. Y. 377.) (3) To charge defendant, appellant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caspersen v. La Sala Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Iacono v. Frank & Frank Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Wohlfron v. Brooklyn Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  4. Wohlfron v. Brooklyn Edison Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zuccelli v. City Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API