Dimare v. George F. Driscoll Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the grounds: (1) The place from which plaintiff fell was not a place of work which the general contractor was bound to keep safe from the defects of which complaint is here made; it was under the control of plaintiff’s employer. (See general rule stated by Mr. Justice Davis in Wohlfron v. Brooklyn Edison Co., Inc., 238 App. Div. 463; affd., 263 N. Y. 547.) (2) It was not a place of work provided by defendant, appellant. (Iacono v. Frank & Frank Contracting Co., 259 N. Y. 377.) (3) To charge defendant, appellant,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Caspersen v. La Sala Bros.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Iacono v. Frank & Frank Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Wohlfron v. Brooklyn Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Wohlfron v. Brooklyn Edison Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zuccelli v. City Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955