Legal Opinion

Sollenberger v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Boohs District Court. Action upon a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff, Stephens, on December 3,1888. The defendants, Sollenberger and another, bring the case to this court. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This was an action in the court below upon a promissory note executed by James H. and John L. Sollenberger to Robert L. Stephens, on August 19, 1886, for $700, with 10 per cent, interest, payable January 1, 1887. There was a credit upon the note of $77. The defendants answered that James H. Sollenberger was of unsound mind, and incapable of managing his own business; that Robert L. Stephens, during a part of 1885 and 1886, acted as his attorney *387in fact in selling town lots in Woodston, Rooks county, and also in transacting his business;…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tinker v. Midland Valley Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API