Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 18, 2004No. H00-111 and H01-041; A118745Published

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

In SAIF v. Ross, 191 Or App 212, 82 P3d 1035 (2003), we held that the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) did not err in interpreting former OAR 436-010-0230(3)(a) (1999), renumbered as OAR 436-010-030(4)(a) (2003), which provides, in part:

“[S]ervices * * * by a medical service provider other than the attending physician shall not be reimbursed unless carried out under a written treatment plan prescribed * * * and approved by the attending physician * * *. The treatment plan shall include objectives, modalities, frequency of treatment and duration. The treatment plan may be recorded in any…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. SAIF Corp. v. RossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API