Thaden v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
AFFIRMED. See Therrien v. State, 859 So.2d 585, 587 (Fla. 1st DCA) (rejecting appellant’s argument that section 775.21, Florida Statutes (2000), violated his right to procedural due process, because it did not require a hearing to determine whether he posed a danger to the public), review ‘pending, No. SC03-2219 (Fla. Dec. 18, 2003). Accord Glenn v. State, 861 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281, 1290…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Espindola v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Milks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Glenn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kensler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004