Haines v. Kent

This was an action brought in consequence of the removal by defendants, of a portion of a fence situ*127atéd on the line dividing the lands occupied by Ilaines and Kent.

The complaint alleges it was a partition fence, built and maintained as such by the grantors of the parties herein.

The answer sets up—

1. That the said partition fence, at the time it was removed, belonged to the said Kent, &c., who gave the plaintiff reasonable notice before he removed said fence, &c.

2. That the land occupied by plaintiff did not belong to him, but that it belonged to one William Kent, and thatthe defendants, with…