Legal Opinion
Kasha v. Department of Transportation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 2, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MIRARCHI, Jr., Senior Judge.
Richard Kasha appeals from a final order of the Secretary of the Department of Transportation (Secretary) affirming the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) request to remove an illegal or abandoned sign. We affirm.
Kasha and his sister inherited a property located along Interstate 79 in Cranberry Township, Butler County. The property is presently zoned “Highway Commercial” by the Township. Since the purchase of the property in 1955 by Ka-sha’s father, it has been used commercially-
In 1970, a sign (subject sign) was erected on the property advertising the “Tou Rest…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Allegheny County Institution District v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Smorgasbord v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harbor Advertising, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Besko Outdoor Media v. PennDOTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018