Legal Opinion

Dorian Johnson v. City of Ferguson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 17, 2019No. 16-1697PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

In Johnson v. City of Ferguson , 864 F.3d 866 (8th Cir. 2017), a panel of our court affirmed the district court's ruling that Dorian Johnson had alleged sufficient facts to state 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims of unlawful seizure and the use of excessive force against former Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson, as well as a claim of supervisory liability against former Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson, and thus denied the defendants' motion for dismissal based upon qualified immunity. We granted their petition for rehearing en banc and vacated the panel's opinion. We now…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of InyoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ash-har Quraishi v. Deputy Michael AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  2. Fred Watson v. Eddie Boyd, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. Maleeha Ahmad v. City of St. Louis, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  4. United States v. Adan Flores-LagonasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. Alvarado v. MooreDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API