Davis v. Mitchell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
While disposing of this appeal on its merits, we deem it nevertheless appropriate to comment briefly on its interlocutory nature. The frequency with which the appellate courts of our State are confronted with appeals which may be deemed interlocutory or fragmentary causes us some considerable concern. The Federal courts as well as a majority of the courts of other jurisdictions have concluded that the setting aside of a default judgment is not ordinarily appealable. See, Murphy v. Helena Rubenstein Co., 355 F. 2d 553 (3rd Cir. 1965); 15 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Equitable Leasing Corp. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Dishman v. DishmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Howard v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blackwelder v. State Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Howard v. Ocean Trail Convalescent CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Metcalf v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re WrightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Decker v. Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.