Legal Opinion

Guill v. Pendleton Woolen Mills

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 1987No. WCB No. 85-09065; CA A42368Published

1Per curiam

Claimant prevailed before the referee in establishing the compensability of her injury claim. Employer appealed to the Workers’ Compensation Board, which affirmed the referee on compensability but reduced the fee which the referee had awarded claimant’s attorney. Claimant seeks judicial review of that action. She argues, first, that jurisdiction to modify a referee’s attorney fees award is solely in the circuit court under ORS 656.386(1) and ORS 656.388(2). Because employer sought Board review of compensability, claimant is wrong. Greenslitt v. City of Lake Oswego, 88 Or App 94, 744 P2d 577…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Greenslitt v. City of Lake OswegoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API