Legal Opinion
Gilda Marx, Inc. v. Wildwood Exercise, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 11, 1996No. Nos. 88-7237, 95-7267 and 95-7269PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
On Motions to Consolidate and to Dismiss
2Per curiam
The district court entered judgment for the defendants and ruled that they were entitled to reimbursement of attorney’s fees they expended in defending against some, but not all, of plaintiffs’ claims. The district court has not yet fixed the amount of the fee award. The plaintiffs appealed from the adverse judgment and from the finding of liability for attorney’s fees, while the defendants cross-appealed from the limitation placed on the fee award. Both parties now move to consolidate the appeal and the…
3Cases cited34 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by67 opinions
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees, Nathaniel McQueen Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Kilburn v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab JamahiriyaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Tara Ann Jungquist v. Sheikh Sultan Bin Khalifa Al NahyanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Special Devices, Inc. v. Oea, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.