Legal Opinion

State v. Arguello

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 2015No. 27351PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Joseph Arguello was convicted of three counts of sexual contact and rape involving three minors. Arguello appeals his conviction on the ground that the trial judge left the courtroom during the presentation of evidence. Arguello also appeals on the ground that the judge failed to give the jury a statutorily required admonishment before recesses and adjournments. We affirm.

Fads and Procedural History

[¶ 2.] Joseph Arguello had a twenty-year, on-again, off-again relationship with R.D. During one period of separation, R.D. married another man and they had three children.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Jay v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. United States v. Rex Eugene Love, United States of America v. Jerry Wayne SheppardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Elizabeth A. Briggs Revocable Living TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. State v. EvansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Miller v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. UhreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API