Legal Opinion

Battle v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 30, 2000No. A00A0800PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Earkus Battle appeals his convictions of two counts of selling cocaine and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He asserts that the trial court erred in admitting, under the necessity exception to the hearsay rule, out-of-court statements made by Avis Jones to narcotics agents Dechon Grant and Rick Galbreath. Because we find that the trial court properly admitted Jones’s out-of-court statements, we affirm.

On November 8, 1996, Jones went to the Columbus Metro Narcotics Task Force office and informed Agents Grant and Galbreath that she could buy crack cocaine…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mallory v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Chapel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  3. Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  4. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Wilbourne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  2. Goldsmith v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. In the Interest of A. T.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Fernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API