Briggs v. Capital Savings & Loan Ass'n
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John F. Stroud, Justice.
This is a suit seeking to declare a promissory note usurious and therefore void the note and the mortgage securing it. The note is clearly usurious unless it falls within the exception of Public Law 93-501, commonly called the Brock Bill. The Chancellor found that the loan was a business loan within the language of the Brock Bill and granted judgment on the counterclaim of Capital Savings & Loan (hereinafter Capital) seeking foreclosure. We agree with the trial court and affirm the judgment.
In the fall of 1976, W. M. Briggs (hereinafter appellant) became involved in a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Digby v. DigbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Minton v. McGowanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Hampton v. HamptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kinkead v. Union National BankCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
- Winn v. Chateau Cantrell Apartment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Winn v. Chateau Cantrell Apartment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990