McCullough v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

his motion for rehearing appellant insists that the evidence is not sufficient to show him guilty of transporting whisky, and he refers us to Richardson v. State, 89 Texas Crim. Rep., 17, and Walling v. State, 94 Texas Crim. Rep., 147, as supporting his contention that he was merely a guest, riding in the car with one Wilson, when the officers stopped them and found whisky in said car. In Walling’s case, supra, the State’s witness, upon whom reliance was had for making out the State’s case, testified that after the liquor was put in the car Walling was…