Legal Opinion

Bricken Construction Corp. v. Cushman

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

The former requirement of subdivision 2 of section 266 of the Civil Practice Act, that a cause of action on contract, in order to be used as a counterclaim, had to be one “ existing at the commencement of the action,” has been repealed (Laws of 1936, chap. 324), and a new section enacted, bearing the same number, which omits that requirement. In addition, section 245-a was added to the Civil Practice Act by chapter 486 of the Laws of 1935. This section provides that the court may permit any party “ to serve a supplemental pleading alleging any new and additional cause or causes of action or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mackay v. TreatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saxon v. SaxonNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Scientific & Hospital Supply Corp. v. Board of EducationCity of New York Municipal Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API